【ethereum token balance api】

Sumethereum token balance apimarize

In terms of business volume, the established projects Aave, Compound and MakerDAO still firmly occupy the top three positions, and their TVL accounts for more than 70% of the entire lending market.litecoin kurzHowever, the rise of emerging lending projects is also amazing. The top ten projects in TVL include Anchor on Terra (US$3.12 billion), Benqi on the avalanche agreement (US$1.23 billion), and Qubit (US$400 million) on BSC. Unlike the big three lending giants that originated in Ethereum, these fast-growing lending forces all come from Ethereum’s competitors, which is the hottest narrative at the moment-the new public chain.

uniswap v2 nedir

What's more surprising is that in addition to the earlier launch time of Anchor (in March this year), the official launch time of the other two projects is only less than one month.In terms of the type of lending business, whether it is the number of projects or the amount of funds, basic lending projects account for a higher proportion, followed by leveraged mining lending projects, and other relatively new ones such as risk-graded interest rate products. The business volume is currently relatively small.This research report will focus on newly born lending projects in the past 1-2 months with rapid business growth (TVL has entered the top 15 lending category), and Euler, a project with many innovative combinations in mechanism.The following is a detailed analysis and analysis of each item.In the combing and analysis part, the author will present and analyze the product positioning, project characteristics, business conditions, token model and risk control of the four projects, in order to analyze these four emerging lending projects as a whole as possible.

Basic lending platformProject StatusShackle one, traditional game players don't really "own" anything. Players mainly buy clothing, weapons, props, etc. on in-game items, but even so, last year's consumption in this area still exceeded US$50 billion. However, in addition to improving player performance and game fun, these game items cannot be used for any other purpose, nor can they be sold, lent or mortgaged for any game items purchased by themselves. These purchase transactions are not real investments.

Shackle two, the interoperability between traditional games is very limited. To a large extent, many games on the current market are still walled gardens: they are independent of different "game worlds" and have their own items and experiences. Of course, this problem is not surprising! Game developers want to gain complete independent control over their own creative efforts, but what if game developers can collaborate with each other in more complex ways?Shackle three, traditional games lack business model options. At this stage, more than 80% of total digital game revenue comes from free games (or "freemium games"). In some successful paid games, most of them only get income through the purchase of skins, which will also limit the design space of some developers. Form follows function. As more game developers launch new business models (such as secondary NFT sales commissions), new game forms will also appear.Why the "Playing and Earning" game can get a big explosionIn fact, there are five major trends that have driven the explosion of "play while earning" games:

Trend 1: The blockchain network continues to expand. Remember the network congestion caused by the "crypto cat" CryptoKitties game in 2017? But now, with the emergence of the second-tier Ethereum expansion protocol, a new high-throughput blockchain, and other scalability solutions, there has been a solid foundation for the vigorous development of blockchain native games;Trend 2: NFT becomes mainstream. Many innovations, including the ERC-721 standard, have spawned the recent upsurge in NFT applications. Game companies now have the tools to NFT games, and more importantly, the public can better understand why rare game assets are valuable.

uniswap v2 nedir

Trend 3: DeFi tools and architectures are increasing. Many basic decentralized financial industry tools (for example, AMM automatic market makers) have been tested in actual combat and have been widely implemented. Game developers can combine these tools to realize game financialization and promote purchase, lending, mortgage and other basic financial activities Now they can all enter the game field smoothly.Trend 4: Web2 interoperability. Many traditional large-scale technology giants have also begun to join the decentralized ecosystem, and have also opened up a new distribution mechanism for encryption-driven games. For example, Apple’s recent changes to the App Store can make it easier for iOS users to directly access NFT-based “sides”. Play and earn” game.Trend 5: Metaverse. "Meta universe" has become a new frontier of digital experience, and the rapid rise of this emerging concept has even aroused Facebook's interest.Summarize

This summer, Axie Infinity achieved explosive growth, and many people were also very excited about Yield Guild, which in turn promoted the flourishing of "play while earning" games. After this craze, traditional game giants and cryptocurrency thought leaders have also begun to pay attention to "play while earning" games-under this strong tailwind, what other projects will be built in the future is very worthy of attention. For investors exploring the field of "playing and earning" games, now is of course a very "fun" moment, but from a broader perspective, it also marks the occurrence of our views on labor, leisure and value Changes-therefore, the "play and earn" game is definitely an important trend we must pay attention to.If you say which one is the most brilliant chain in the second half of this year, there is no doubt that solana is worthy of its name. SOL was founded by former Qualcomm, Intel and Dropbox engineers at the end of 2017. Solana is high-performance, fast, generous and rich in the project, and the team has SBF. Blessing, these distinctive features have enabled solana's defi to be launched one after another since May, and reached a blowout level. This is mainly due to the continuous development of the market and ecology of solana, and three consecutive hackathons were held within a year. Most of the projects have been effectively incubated. Obviously, Solana's reputation has overtaken polkadot and become a new public chain giant.The specific situation is actually very simple. The ecological project parrot conducts IDO. According to official regulations, users can receive tokens when IDO is completed, and then they can trade at the same time. On the one hand, the enthusiasm for participation is high and the user base is large. Most people wanted to sell at a high price for the first time, which caused congestion on the chain and data overflow and collapse of most nodes. In the end, the network was paralyzed for more than ten hours. It can be said that similar incidents are almost hard to come across.On the one hand, the enthusiasm of users is indeed too high. On the other hand, the high-performance public chain also faces the risk of being questioned. Fortunately, after the official team released the new version of the program, the solana network returned to normal and everyone can continue to play.

However, this incident has given many people a thought as to what kind of public chain we need in the future.On the one hand, POW-type mining public chains such as Bitcoin face the problem of low TPS and cannot carry the high-demand transactions of the existing DEFI. On the other hand, chains such as Solana, fantom, and polygon are facing a tendency to become more centralized. When there is a peak, the network becomes unstable, and even this kind of network is paralyzed. However, it seems that there is still no good solution to get the advantages of both at the same time.

剔蝎撩蜂网

Why is the high TPS public chain unstable?Many people may have heard of the "Impossible Triangle" in the currency circle, that is, high performance, security and decentralization are not available at the same time. Security is one of the main directions at present, so high performance and decentralization It becomes the opposite, and solana mainly improves the transmission rate, that is, performance, so there are naturally certain shortcomings in decentralization.

However, this situation does not hurt a lot in the bull market. The rise of DEFI in the bull market is still based on practicality. Solana is obviously more practical, so this does not prevent capital from paying attention to it.But for other high-performance public chains, they may all face similar problems. When the user group's sentiment is high, the transfer on the chain reaches the upper limit of the load, and there is no certain protection measure, then the network may collapse, and Solana has funds. Yes, even if it collapses, the currency price is still relatively stable, and it has not fallen much. On the contrary, it shows that the ecological development is successful and the user participation is high. Compared with other public chains, if it collapses, can you still have such good luck? Probably not.The POW chain still maintains good network security and decentralizationFor the early POW chains, their decentralization is still relatively high, such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum. The degree of decentralization of the network mainly depends on the decentralization of the true owners of computing power. Many people mistakenly believe that the current Bitcoin mining pools account for a large percentage of the computing power of the mining pool. If the mining pool is attacked, it is equivalent to the block producer being attacked, which will affect the network security. To a certain extent, this view is still partially flawed.The computing power we are talking about is mainly based on the actual autonomous distribution rights of users, rather than the operating status of the block node. For example, most mining pools are actually running in professional computer rooms. The computing power of mining pools is high. To a certain extent, it will lead to centralization, but the mining power of an individual can change at any time. That is to say, the mining rights of the mining pool are the result of the choice made by the miners, and this choice can be changed instantly. For example, cutting off computing power is also a matter of minutes. Non-POW nodes have to undergo a series of processes such as reselection and voting, which also delays a certain amount of time. Therefore, POW is relatively advantageous.For example, in the POW chain, when mining pool A is attacked or there is a problem with the node, in theory, the block generation speed on the chain will be greatly reduced at this time. A block in the previous 10 minutes may now take 15 minutes on average, unless it is time to adjust the difficulty. , But for miners, they can cut their own computing power to other mining pools, which completes the redistribution process of computing power. The mining pool's computing power is reshuffled without affecting the efficiency of the overall network, and blocks are generated. The time will soon return to the previous 10 minutes, which completes the adaptive adjustment of the network.

Therefore, the impact of attacking a certain mining pool node of Bitcoin and Ethereum on the network is relatively small, so why does the POW network not improve the efficiency of the chain?In fact, this is mainly because the POW chain requires a large number of calculations to determine the hash value, which increases the difficulty of tampering and forks to a certain extent, thereby ensuring security, although the current block generation speed of some POW chains is also Increase, but we can clearly compare the problem that may exist when the speed increases, that is, the problem of easy bifurcation.

Bitcoin is a block in 10 minutes, and it is not easy to forkEthereum has a block in about 13 seconds, and sometimes an uncle block is needed to ensure that the transaction does not fork

A public chain with a higher block generation rate has a block every two seconds. Except for the uncle block, there is a certain rejection rate when mining to ensure that there is no fork.The faster the chain, the higher the possibility of forking. Therefore, in order to ensure a complete chain, it can only bring a higher rejection rate or try to ensure the computing power while increasing the ability to perform multitasking at the same time. The fork will soon be strangled into the cradle.

For non-POW public chains, this does not happen, because they no longer need to rely on competition to ensure their own block qualifications, some are in turn, and some are random, so that they wait until the node has a block. In the case of block qualification, only a small amount of computing power is required to successfully generate eligible blocks. Because of this, the non-POW public chain itself can have high block generation efficiency, and most of the resources will be used above the block generation speed.The future Ethereum 2.0 adopts the method of sharding. In fact, it decentralizes the rights of nodes and realizes another mode of decentralization as a whole. However, from the perspective of each shard chain, it is still It is relatively close to centralization, so just like others' laughter, most public chains run in centralized computer rooms. As long as the computer room is powered off, the public chain can die for a large amount of time. It is biased, but it can show that there is still a long way to go in the exploration of public chains.Few institutional investors take risks on high-growth stocks because of price volatility and the innovative nature of the business. However, Cathie Wood, the head of ARK Investment Management, has become an investor. Wall Street investors invest in technology. Cathie Wood manages more than $53 billion in assets in her hedge fund. The top 10 investments account for 35 of the portfolio. %. And in 2014 founded ARK Investment Management Company. Her fund has now become the US Environmental Fund.Cathie Wood's holdings are concentrated in high-growth areas such as technology and healthcare. This is also one of the reasons why Cathie Wood has become a supporter of retail investors. Retail investors are market forces that have gradually increased in recent months. They also like the investment style similar to Mu sister. In 2020, Mu Jie's ARK Innovation ETF has brought investors more than 152% returns. Although the recent gains of ARK have slowed down, Ms. Mu is still sticking to her investment model.

At the end of the second quarter of 2021, some of the top holdings in ARK Investment Management’s portfolio were Tesla Inc. (Tesla, Inc.), Twitter, Inc. (NYSE: TWTR), Square, Inc. (NYSE: SQ) ), Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROKU), Shopify Inc. (NYSE: SHOP), etc. Although Tesla is still the fund’s largest holding, the total holdings are worth more than $4 billion. According to updated data from Ark Investment Management LLC, the fund sold nearly 89,000 Tesla shares (worth US$66 million) and added more than 236,000 shares of Robinhood (worth US$10 million). So far this month, they have increased their holdings of approximately 390,000 Robinhood shares. At the same time, it sold Tesla stock worth $200 million.In the past five months, ARK's funds have sold more than 1 million shares of Tesla stock. But Tesla is still one of its heavyweights.

The following are the stocks that Ms. Mu has been selling based on ARK's public records.1. SBI Holdings, Inc.

SBI Holdings, Inc. has a market value of more than 6 billion U.S. dollars, and its annual revenue in the previous fiscal year was close to 5 billion U.S. dollars. The company was founded in 1999 and has more than 9,000 employees worldwide. SBI Holdings, Inc. (OTC: SBHGF) has a seven-year history of dividend growth. The 52-week price range of the stock is between $22 and $37. The company's revenue has grown at a compound annual growth rate of more than 16%.SBI Group is also closely related to the crypto market, especially with Ripple. SBI has always been one of the strongest supporters of XRP in the Japanese market.

Unlike Tesla, Twitter, Inc., Square, Inc., Roku, Inc. and Shopify Inc., SBI Holdings, Inc. (OTC: SBHGF) is one of the stocks that Cathie Wood has been selling.2. InterCure Ltd.InterCure Ltd. is for sale by Cathie Wood. The company is headquartered in Israel and manufactures and sells hemp products. InterCure Ltd. (NASDAQ: INCR) has a market capitalization of more than US$318 million and last year's revenue exceeded US$20 million. (Nasdaq: INCR) has a market value of more than 318 million U.S. dollars and last year's revenue exceeded 20 million U.S. dollars. It was established in 1994. The stock's trading volume was 1,531,006, and the 52-week price range was between $3 and $40.In the second quarter earnings report released on September 3, InterCure Ltd. (NASDAQ: INCR) announced the earnings for the second quarter. (NASDAQ: INCR) reported revenue of NT$45 million, an increase of more than 300% compared to the same period last year.

3. BiondVax Pharmaceuticals Ltd.BiondVax Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (NASDAQ: BVXV) is a biopharmaceutical company based in Israel that develops and sells treatments for infectious diseases. On August 26, BiondVax Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Nasdaq: BVXV) announced its earnings for the second quarter, reporting that its earnings per share were NT$0.01. Cash and cash equivalents during this period were 39 million NIS, lower than the 48 million NIS in the same period last year.

At the end of the second quarter of 2021, two hedge funds in the Insider Monkey database held shares of BiondVax Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (NASDAQ: BVXV) worth US$292,000. (NASDAQ: BVXV), lower than the three in the previous quarter, valued at US$190,000.4. Phreesia, Inc.

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) is a North Carolina-based company that sells software and payment solutions for the healthcare industry. On September 3, investment consulting firm Raymond James maintained its stock in Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) and raised its target price from US$65 to US$75, pointing out that the company is taking measures to achieve long-term growth goals.Among the hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey, Maryland-based investment company Rock Springs Capital Management is the major shareholder of Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR), holding 960,000 shares, valued at more than $58 million.

Both Sides of the Table

Perspectives of a 2x entrepreneur turned VC at @UpfrontVC#

Mark Suster

Written by

2x entrepreneur. Sold both companies (last to salesforce.com). Turned VC looking to invest in passionate entrepreneurs 〞 I*m on Twitter at @msuster

Both Sides of the Table

Perspectives of a 2x entrepreneur turned VC at @UpfrontVC, the largest and most active early-stage fund in Southern California. Snapchat: msuster

Mark Suster

Written by

2x entrepreneur. Sold both companies (last to salesforce.com). Turned VC looking to invest in passionate entrepreneurs 〞 I*m on Twitter at @msuster

Both Sides of the Table

Perspectives of a 2x entrepreneur turned VC at @UpfrontVC, the largest and most active early-stage fund in Southern California. Snapchat: msuster